top of page

The Bonus Plan Autopsy: Why Money Rarely Fixes What You Think It Fixes

So a director calls me up, and he's got this request that sounds almost too simple.

His project managers keep missing deadlines. Running over budget too. And he's already got the fix figured out. Pay them more to stop doing that. A bonus, split fifty-fifty between hitting the deadline and hitting the budget.

Honestly? It's not a crazy idea. You want a behavior, you reward it. That's basic management stuff.

But then we actually started digging into what was going on, and the whole thing kind of fell apart.

First thing I did wasn't look at the bonus math. I asked about the project managers who were already crushing it. Because every team has a few, right? So what were they doing differently? And it had nothing to do with motivation. These folks were following an actual process. They flagged risks early instead of crossing their fingers. They managed the business side proactively instead of scrambling when things blew up. None of that comes from a bonus. That comes from having a good process, or a good habit, or someone showing you the ropes.

Then came the harder question, the one nobody really wants to ask out loud: is there any actual proof that money is the problem here?

Turns out nobody had bothered asking the underperforming project managers why they were missing deadlines. Wild, right? So we finally did. And the answers were nothing about incentives. It was messy scope changes coming out of nowhere from the business side. Inconsistent access to the specialists they needed. And a few of them just... didn't know the process the star performers were using. Nobody had ever taught it to them.

Here's the part that stings a little. If we'd gone ahead with that bonus plan, it probably would've made things worse. You'd be paying people for outcomes they didn't actually have control over yet. Some would get lucky and cash in for reasons that had nothing to do with skill. Others would work just as hard, get hit with the same chaotic scope changes, miss the deadline anyway, and now feel punished on top of everything else.

That's not a pay problem. That's a trust problem waiting to happen.

What we actually built looked nothing like the original ask. A documented process, basically copying what the star performers were already doing on instinct. A clearer way to handle scope bonus plan at all.

Money rarely fixes what you think it fixes
Money rarely fixes what you think it fixes

I think about this one every time someone tells me the answer is obviously more money, or a better perk, or a flashier incentive. Sometimes, sure, it is. But a lot of the time it's really just standing in for a question nobody's bothered to answer yet.

Do we actually know why people aren't performing? Or are we just guessing, and hoping the paycheck covers for it?

Do the autopsy first. Before you write the check.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page